
I'm a fan of Robert Frank's work which is what led me to see his exhibit at the Met. I've seen
The Americans in book form, so it was strange and interesting to see them presented on the wall in that manner. The way they were set up, wrapping around the walls of several different rooms led you on a journey that was quite different from its book form. It was almost maze like and many people around me just chose to look at them out of order. But thats the thing about a gallery versus book format-- you don't have as much control of direction. The images are captivating and mundane at the same time, one of those "anywhere U.S.A." type of scenarios, but I had already seen that in the book.
What I found most interesting were the photographs that Frank decided to eliminate from the book. There was a whole wall of printed photographs and centerpieces of contact sheets. It shows the volume of work that the artist produced and what his elimination process was. For instance most of the photographs showed the subjects looking at something distant and unseen-- not at the camera. I noticed that some of the photos were of the same subjects making eye contact with the photographer. These are just interesting questions to think about, especially in terms of what to show in your own work. I mean, I'm not a photographer, but I feel that every artist must at some point narrow their scope of what they want to portray, what they like and the references they use. So, that part was beneficial to me.